Thursday, October 4, 2012

Grammar(s) in the Classroom

Before I read the Hartwell article, I was under the impression that English instructors always unanimously consider grammar instruction to be vitally important.  It was a great relief for me to learn that is not the case.  I have often reflected on my own lack of formal grammar training, wondering why I never really received any growing up.  I have felt at a disadvantage as a student and future English teacher because of this, and have found myself wishing that I had gotten some formal instruction.  After reading Hartwell's article I find myself wondering if perhaps I was taught about grammar in school, and I just don't remember any of it. This may or may not be the case but either way I am much more confident now in my feeling that grammar instruction should not take up ample classroom time.  I already have too many things in my mind that I want to teach my students, and I consider this content to be much more important than grammar instruction after reading about all of these case studies denouncing its effectiveness.  I know that I learned my 'grammar 1' from all of the reading and writing I did as a child, and I want to help my students pick it up the same way.  An idea I have for possible instruction technique is to include the recognition of grammar errors in students' work, but not grading it.  This might be a way I could point out some of the formal rules but in a way that is not so confusing and rote.  I could have them correct their errors for a homework assignment so they get some practice in correcting at least some more widely used and accepted rules of formal grammar.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you, and Hartwell's article was a relief to me too when I read it. But I'd encourage you to learn some of the fundamentals of English grammar in any case, simply because you'll always have a kind of basic anxiety about that lack if you don't - a basic book of English grammar - slight, not deep, grammar 2 stuff. Also, you don't want to worry about the possibility that you're not teaching grammar because you don't know it well enough! That strikes me as not a good reason. Trust me Emma, the time you spend doing this sort of study will be well worth it.

    Of course we've got to attend to student writing, but already you've made an important leap, I think. The kind of grammar instruction Hartwell decries is completely decontextualized - as soon as you are talking about actual student-generated texts, it's placed in an actual context. At that point, then, it becomes important not to over react to error!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do really like your ideas about contextualized grammar instruction; those are awesome! I am a little confused though. You say that you have felt disadvantaged because of a lack of grammar instruction in high school. Yet, you are relieved that you are not expected to teach your future students grammar. Don't you worry that you could likewise "disadvantage" your future students by not teaching them about rules of grammar? I think it is worth considering...

    ReplyDelete